Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#50181 - 05/19/09 08:24 PM pSXoSX  
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 540
Sune Offline
Senior Member
Sune  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 540
Brazil
I guess this the most closely related forum to ask about this. Besides, Paratech's $98 laptop is getting old.

pSX Author once said somewhere that a friend of his was working on a Mac port (or wanted to work on one) of pSX.

Is that still happening? I know some of MAMEDev has collaborated with pSX Author in the past so I thought maybe you might know a little something..just to feed the rumor mill.

pSX runs remarkably well on XP via Parallels on my Mac though, which is pretty amazing.

#50182 - 05/19/09 08:31 PM Re: pSXoSX [Re: Sune]  
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 15,520
R. Belmont Offline
R. Belmont  Offline

Very Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 15,520
USA
Given there's a working Linux version with very nice OpenGL rendering I would assume OS X is a chip shot. I don't know anything specific about any pSX port though though.

#50183 - 05/19/09 09:12 PM Re: pSXoSX [Re: R. Belmont]  
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 540
Sune Offline
Senior Member
Sune  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 540
Brazil
alright then. I guess it takes someone who really wants to do it. They would have to track down pSXAuthor and beat his door down and then get him to trust them with the source code first. Probably not happening!

#50199 - 05/20/09 06:57 PM Re: pSXoSX [Re: Sune]  
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 889
Richard Bannister Offline
Richard Bannister  Offline


Senior Member

Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 889
Dublin, Ireland
I might...


Noli umquam docere porcum cantare; perdes tempus et irritabis porcum.
#50204 - 05/20/09 10:25 PM Re: pSXoSX [Re: Richard Bannister]  
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 540
Sune Offline
Senior Member
Sune  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 540
Brazil
Wow, that would be awesome. There hasn't been a good PlayStation emulator for the Mac since VGS.

#50233 - 05/21/09 05:29 PM Re: pSXoSX [Re: Sune]  
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 889
Richard Bannister Offline
Richard Bannister  Offline


Senior Member

Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 889
Dublin, Ireland
Oh I disagree. PCSX was pretty good...


Noli umquam docere porcum cantare; perdes tempus et irritabis porcum.
#50236 - 05/21/09 06:23 PM Re: pSXoSX [Re: Richard Bannister]  
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,684
etabeta78 Offline
Very Senior Member
etabeta78  Offline
Very Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,684
Trondheim, Norway
yet, pSX would be better wink

#50249 - 05/22/09 11:30 AM Re: pSXoSX [Re: Richard Bannister]  
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 57
Flash Offline
Senior Member
Flash  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 57
Moscow, Russia
Originally Posted By Richard Bannister
Oh I disagree. PCSX was pretty good...

Yep, because it was the only working emulator for OS X smile
But it was slow and compatibility wasn't that good.

Last edited by Flash; 05/22/09 11:36 AM.

System specs: Linux (2.6.29.4), A64 X2 5400+, 6Gb RAM, Quadro FX 5600.
#50403 - 05/30/09 11:33 AM Re: pSXoSX [Re: Flash]  
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 351
ReadOnly Offline
Senior Member
ReadOnly  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 351
<!-- troll mode -->
buy a PC they're cheap
<!-- end of troll mode -->

I had no idea pSX author was collaborating with some mamedev, can you give more details about this collaboration? is it for the benefit of pSX, or MAME or both?

#50404 - 05/30/09 11:39 AM Re: pSXoSX [Re: ReadOnly]  
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 15,520
R. Belmont Offline
R. Belmont  Offline

Very Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 15,520
USA
Both. And that's all the detail you're getting.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  R. Belmont 

Who's Online Now
1 registered members (nerd4gw), 27 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box
Forum Statistics
Forums9
Topics8,309
Posts107,365
Members4,732
Most Online225
May 26th, 2014
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.089s Queries: 14 (0.010s) Memory: 5.0157 MB (Peak: 5.2452 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-29 09:12:23 UTC