Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 72 of 80 1 2 70 71 72 73 74 79 80
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,217
Likes: 234
R
Very Senior Member
Offline
Very Senior Member
R
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,217
Likes: 234
Kelvin Sherlock gave a short presentation earlier today for KansasFest 2021 on MAME's Apple II emulation and his very special-purpose Mac frontend, Ample.

Skip to 2:34:50 for his presentation.


Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 382
J
Very Senior Member
Offline
Very Senior Member
J
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 382
For future reference, you can just append the number of seconds to jump to, even if it's an embedded link, like so: &t=9220s

For example:

[video:youtube]
[/video]

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 616
Likes: 6
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 616
Likes: 6
You don't even need to convert it to seconds, you can just append &t=2h34m50s

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,217
Likes: 234
R
Very Senior Member
Offline
Very Senior Member
R
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,217
Likes: 234
Both my and JD's links just play at the beginning for me, I even tried multiple browsers. I *did* include the &t= tag on my link.

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 34
H
Very Senior Member
Offline
Very Senior Member
H
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 34
yeah I don't think it works with the embed code here

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 382
J
Very Senior Member
Offline
Very Senior Member
J
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 382
Yeah, it seems like YouTube was just remembering the previous timestamp that I had set it to, because now it plays from 2:55:40 for me.

Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 37
Likes: 8
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 37
Likes: 8
Yeah, if you look at the HTML source you don't see the &t anywhere... I wonder if you did it as & amp ; t=whatever would work... (without the spaces)

Last edited by MrBogi; 07/25/21 04:10 PM.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,217
Likes: 234
R
Very Senior Member
Offline
Very Senior Member
R
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,217
Likes: 234
More positive MAME attention from KansasFest, this time at 13:23, as part of the wrap-up podcast.


Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 382
J
Very Senior Member
Offline
Very Senior Member
J
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 382
To be fair, it's more of a mixed bag of feedback than you let on. There's positive feedback, there's (valid) negative feedback, there are people who apparently took 3 weeks to get MAME set up (most likely, if anything, due to the profusion of outdated and outright wrong guides out there), and then there are some questionable takes about running full-fat MAME on an earlier model of the Raspberry Pi than the 4. That last one is something I don't see realistically happening given the overhead of a cycle-exact 6502 core combined with the sheer number of other devices that need scheduling.

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,217
Likes: 234
R
Very Senior Member
Offline
Very Senior Member
R
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,217
Likes: 234
Quinn (who said she took 2 weeks to set up a cabinet) has designed and built several custom computers from scratch so she was definitely following some questionable documentation.

The PI thing will absolutely end in tears if it's not at least a 3, and ideally a 4, but I don't consider that to be really about MAME, given that LinApple also doesn't run full speed on lower-end Pis.

Page 72 of 80 1 2 70 71 72 73 74 79 80

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
2 members (AJR, Bletch), 335 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Forum Statistics
Forums9
Topics9,320
Posts121,944
Members5,074
Most Online1,283
Dec 21st, 2022
Our Sponsor
These forums are sponsored by Superior Solitaire, an ad-free card game collection for macOS and iOS. Download it today!

Superior Solitaire
Forum hosted by www.retrogamesformac.com