Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
pSXoSX #50181 05/19/09 08:24 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 548
S
Sune Offline OP
Senior Member
OP Offline
Senior Member
S
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 548
I guess this the most closely related forum to ask about this. Besides, Paratech's $98 laptop is getting old.

pSX Author once said somewhere that a friend of his was working on a Mac port (or wanted to work on one) of pSX.

Is that still happening? I know some of MAMEDev has collaborated with pSX Author in the past so I thought maybe you might know a little something..just to feed the rumor mill.

pSX runs remarkably well on XP via Parallels on my Mac though, which is pretty amazing.

Re: pSXoSX [Re: Sune] #50182 05/19/09 08:31 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 16,273
R
R. Belmont Online Content
Very Senior Member
Online Content
Very Senior Member
R
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 16,273
Given there's a working Linux version with very nice OpenGL rendering I would assume OS X is a chip shot. I don't know anything specific about any pSX port though though.

Re: pSXoSX [Re: R. Belmont] #50183 05/19/09 09:12 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 548
S
Sune Offline OP
Senior Member
OP Offline
Senior Member
S
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 548
alright then. I guess it takes someone who really wants to do it. They would have to track down pSXAuthor and beat his door down and then get him to trust them with the source code first. Probably not happening!

Re: pSXoSX [Re: Sune] #50199 05/20/09 06:57 PM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 892
Richard Bannister Offline
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 892
I might...


Noli umquam docere porcum cantare; perdes tempus et irritabis porcum.
Re: pSXoSX [Re: Richard Bannister] #50204 05/20/09 10:25 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 548
S
Sune Offline OP
Senior Member
OP Offline
Senior Member
S
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 548
Wow, that would be awesome. There hasn't been a good PlayStation emulator for the Mac since VGS.

Re: pSXoSX [Re: Sune] #50233 05/21/09 05:29 PM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 892
Richard Bannister Offline
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 892
Oh I disagree. PCSX was pretty good...


Noli umquam docere porcum cantare; perdes tempus et irritabis porcum.
Re: pSXoSX [Re: Richard Bannister] #50236 05/21/09 06:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,687
etabeta78 Offline
Very Senior Member
Offline
Very Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,687
yet, pSX would be better wink

Re: pSXoSX [Re: Richard Bannister] #50249 05/22/09 11:30 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 57
F
Flash Offline
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
F
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 57
Originally Posted By Richard Bannister
Oh I disagree. PCSX was pretty good...

Yep, because it was the only working emulator for OS X smile
But it was slow and compatibility wasn't that good.

Last edited by Flash; 05/22/09 11:36 AM.

System specs: Linux (2.6.29.4), A64 X2 5400+, 6Gb RAM, Quadro FX 5600.
Re: pSXoSX [Re: Flash] #50403 05/30/09 11:33 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 351
R
ReadOnly Offline
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
R
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 351
<!-- troll mode -->
buy a PC they're cheap
<!-- end of troll mode -->

I had no idea pSX author was collaborating with some mamedev, can you give more details about this collaboration? is it for the benefit of pSX, or MAME or both?

Re: pSXoSX [Re: ReadOnly] #50404 05/30/09 11:39 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 16,273
R
R. Belmont Online Content
Very Senior Member
Online Content
Very Senior Member
R
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 16,273
Both. And that's all the detail you're getting.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  R. Belmont 

Who's Online Now
2 registered members (Luengo, AJR), 85 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
ShoutChat Box
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Forum Statistics
Forums9
Topics8,673
Posts113,787
Members4,852
Most Online418
Aug 14th, 2019
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3