Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: pSXoSX [Re: R. Belmont] #50412 05/30/09 02:08 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 351
R
ReadOnly Offline
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
R
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 351
I used to chat a lot with pSXAuthor, but it was a semi decade ago, long before he became an emuceleb, and when he was easily accessible. We were talking about technical stuffs, or psx gaming, or other stuff you don't need to know about... I still remember how he impressed me with his rock solid technical knowledge of the PS1, and even tho I never asked him, I knew who he was working for... *cough*

In all honnesty I'm surprised that his emulator isn't perfect yet and can benefit from mame. I thought it would long be perfect by now, but it's been years I haven't launched a psx emulator nor visited his website, so I did never check confirmation.

Oh! And I think I won't offend pSXAuthor by revealing that one of his most favorites PS1 games was Valkyrie Profile, like me. Tho I will not reveal which ps2 games he could run even at that time. :x

Re: pSXoSX [Re: ReadOnly] #50414 05/30/09 02:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 16,274
R
R. Belmont Offline
Very Senior Member
Offline
Very Senior Member
R
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 16,274
smf's run a lot of low-level tests on real hardware (as has pSXAuthor) so they have plenty to share (most recently on bit-perfect GTE operations).

Re: pSXoSX [Re: R. Belmont] #50450 05/31/09 12:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,687
etabeta78 Offline
Very Senior Member
Offline
Very Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,687
the real question is why shouldn't they collaborate? I mean, sharing info is positive for both open & close source projects because it can lead to new discoveries and better implementations...

Re: pSXoSX [Re: etabeta78] #50595 06/06/09 05:22 PM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 892
Richard Bannister Offline
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 892
I'm hearing that pSXAuthor has done his own port...


Noli umquam docere porcum cantare; perdes tempus et irritabis porcum.
Re: pSXoSX [Re: Richard Bannister] #50609 06/07/09 01:11 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 548
S
Sune Offline OP
Senior Member
OP Offline
Senior Member
S
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 548
w00t.

Looks like I'll have to check on http://psxemulator.gazaxian.com/ several times a day now..

Re: pSXoSX [Re: ] #66696 01/11/11 06:39 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,801
J
Just Desserts Offline
Very Senior Member
Offline
Very Senior Member
J
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,801
Necrothreading a 2-year-old thread? We've got a winner here, Deke!

Re: pSXoSX [Re: Sune] #66697 01/11/11 07:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 548
S
Sune Offline OP
Senior Member
OP Offline
Senior Member
S
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 548
It's a Vietnamese spambot.

Re: pSXoSX [Re: Sune] #66698 01/11/11 07:41 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 16,274
R
R. Belmont Offline
Very Senior Member
Offline
Very Senior Member
R
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 16,274
And Sune should know since it copied his post from the earlier page of this thread smile

Re: pSXoSX [Re: Sune] #66701 01/11/11 08:31 PM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 892
Richard Bannister Offline
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 892
Gah. In the forum move I forgot to turn on e-mail verification. I've done so now...


Noli umquam docere porcum cantare; perdes tempus et irritabis porcum.
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  R. Belmont 

Who's Online Now
2 registered members (zino, 1 invisible), 145 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
ShoutChat Box
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Forum Statistics
Forums9
Topics8,673
Posts113,800
Members4,852
Most Online418
Aug 14th, 2019
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3