I don't know. I did a quick google before replying to him and sent him some links (that he already knew about), but he thought that the microcode ROM hadn't been dumped completely yet. After I sent him the file, he mentioned OG's dump, and then later said that there were 11 diffs (probably all my errors; I haven't compared the files yet). He did question the size of my file; I guess some sources said that the nanoROM was 366x68 bits, but the visual dumps were smaller than that. It turns out that 366 was a typo for 336, and the visual dumps are the correct size.
Not sure where he's getting the incorrect/incomplete from. I personally dumped the microcode visually from john's and v6502's images, and from the extracted schematic where I vectored the active layer. Then I checked every bit that was different anywhere on the vectorization and fixed as needed. I'm fairly certain of the result.
Of course, once you have the microcode, the real story happens between the execution unit and the rom itself, where the ~90 signals from the rom are mixed with the current IR register to generate the 150-200 actual control signals. That's what I've been spending some time on since a while.
