ComputerEyes/2 was much more painful since it actually polls the composite sync and expects the true raster V position to be the V position of the capture (the horizontal position is handled internally by the hardware). But it gives nicer results, especially in double-hi-res greyscale:

[Linked Image from rbelmont.mameworld.info]

ETA: And a little MAMEception: here's a MAME screenshot from the IIgs driver used as source for a //e double-hi-res capture:

[Linked Image from rbelmont.mameworld.info]

Last edited by R. Belmont; 08/25/19 11:39 PM.